tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7407965.post8134979281938858267..comments2024-03-27T06:09:20.323+00:00Comments on EdCompBlog: Copyright - Walking the tightropeDavidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08614417017549146281noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7407965.post-773693212360972422013-09-28T09:20:31.427+01:002013-09-28T09:20:31.427+01:00Your blog is soo help full. i literally enjoyed to...Your blog is soo help full. i literally enjoyed to read it<br />"<a href="" rel="nofollow">correspondence course</a><br /><a href="" rel="nofollow">industrial safety course in india</a><br /><a href="" rel="nofollow">it courses in mumbai</a><br /><a href="" rel="nofollow">distance education in mumbai for mba</a><br /><a href="" rel="nofollow">fire and safety course in mumbai</a>"<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10475903941911839526noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7407965.post-20128001966444098112012-05-05T13:07:27.642+01:002012-05-05T13:07:27.642+01:00Hi David,
I had this problem with Racism KT but fo...Hi David,<br />I had this problem with <a href="http://youtu.be/ik-YvHtErWY" rel="nofollow">Racism KT</a> but followed the process indicated by YouTube and registered the video as being used for an educational purpose and they allowed it to remain on the site. Looking at the fact that it has only been viewed 20 times in the last 12 months I don't think the copyright holders of the music can claim it would impact of royalty earnings.<br /><br />Another video is <a href="http://youtu.be/-oNA_F-1AqI" rel="nofollow">Come Little Children</a> that uses a song from Hocus Pocus to accompany some stop frame animation created by some BEd2 students, has never been tagged with a copyright notice. Although that may have something to do with the explosion during it that may prevent any auto detection software from recognising it or that it spoils the music so listeners cant use it to hear music for free.<br /><br />I think these educational use exemptions are in American copyright law not UK, but I'm not complaining.Kenneth...https://www.blogger.com/profile/08085977493501373065noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7407965.post-74466286530018998262012-05-02T13:28:04.613+01:002012-05-02T13:28:04.613+01:00It looks like taking a blunderbuss to crack a nut....It looks like taking a blunderbuss to crack a nut. Fire off enough automatically generated pellets and you might just hit something worth hitting... eventually! I know there is stuff on YouTube that technically breaks copyright but I also suspect that little or any of it is causing the entertainment industry to lose money! I agree with you - free advertising is closer to the mark. Certainly this clip made me think, "I must watch Speed again." - not something I can say I ever thought I'd hear myself think!Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08614417017549146281noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7407965.post-1729522817301621972012-05-01T21:34:02.923+01:002012-05-01T21:34:02.923+01:00I would say very much counter-productive. Small sn...I would say very much counter-productive. Small snippets are allowed under UK law at least for review purposes. In the US, you're also allowed to rip music off wholesale for parody.<br /><br />But have a 30 second clip of a baby dancing with a Michael Jackson song playing in the background on the radio in incredibly bad quality and expect laywers to come knocking - as they did for one family a couple of years ago.<br /><br />Surely a small clip of a film or low quality samples of songs are free advertising? As you said, where's the harm? In fact, without looking I think the UK CD&P Act states that the complainant must suffer financial loss or the defendant make financial gain from the infringement for the case to even be heard.Mosherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00374548021605224698noreply@blogger.com